![sansa sandisk sansa sandisk](https://www.yopi.de/product_images/312/312730/list_large/sandisk-sansa-clip-4gb.png)
Then there’s the storage capacity, a whopping 4GB of onboard flash is exactly twice as much as the equivalent priced Nano and equates to around 1000 MP3 tracks or 2000 WMA ones.
![sansa sandisk sansa sandisk](https://i5.walmartimages.com/asr/26237487-7564-4745-a125-1f5b0b081038_1.3db0147551519fe1531fe88c6973731c.jpeg)
It is also almost exactly the same size as the Nano, apart from being twice as thick, but again we are only talking 12.5mm here. It does add to the weight though, 75g compared to the 45g of an iPod Nano, but pocket busting it certainly isn’t. This almost industrial solidity doesn’t impact negatively on the design, we think it looks the business. This metal alloy is apparently both harder wearing and more elastic than similar titanium/aluminium alloys, and the scratch resistance is superb: even the reviewers key filled pockets couldn’t ruin it. The scratch resistant (although sadly the same cannot be said for fingerprints) glossy plastic front is now attached to a "Liquidmetal" back plate that actually accounts for some two-thirds of the depth of the device. Let’s start with the build quality shall we: this is no toy. So how is the e260 different? Completely, that’s all. The c150 was wrong in as many ways as the e260 is right from the flimsy toy feel of the thing and the poor colour screen to the appetite for AAA batteries. The very idea that SanDisk, makers of memory cards, would come up with such a device following the frankly laughable effort that was the Sansa c150 could have earned you a very nice return had you bet on it with us a couple of weeks ago. (Pocket-lint) - Oh no, not another MP3 player you say? To which we reply, correct: this is not just another MP3 player.